This was not that year.
There were only four plays I was interested in seeing during the summer season -- Peter and the Starcatcher, The Tempest, King John, and Twelve Angry Men. Due to a bunch of reasons and other plans, it was difficult to find two consecutive days to see the Festival, and very little likelihood I'd get to see all four of those particular plays during any two-day period. So, I picked the only day that the two I wanted to see most were playing, and put it on my schedule. Sadly, by the time I'd picked a day, none of the people I'd invited could come. Unsadly, I'm fairly used to seeing plays by myself ;) Also, other friends had been, so I had no shortage of people to talk to about them!
... The trip was awesome! With the exception of being stressed about driving to and from Cedar City in time for my commitments (because I am terrible at time management), it was a relaxing, blissful trip.
This is the play that has been receiving the most buzz, and now I know why. It's the Regional premiere (meaning that this is the first time ANYONE has done this play, except for Broadway), which is a pretty big deal. The story is based on a prequel novel written by Dave Barry and Ridley Pearson, and during the course of the action things like how Peter arrived in Neverland, why he can fly and doesn't age, how Captain Hook lost his hand, and where fairies and mermaids come from are explained.
When the elderly couple with the seats next to mine sat down before the show, the woman said, "I love Peter Pan," and the husband said, "I hate Peter Pan." He clarified for me during intermission (because he could tell I was loving it) "I like Peter Pan who flies and lives in Neverland." So, I could understand why he wasn't a fan, especially during the first act.
Peter and the Starcatchers is NOT your grandmother's Peter Pan. If you were looking forward to a "classic" play with huge sets and complicated scene changes and flying children, you were disappointed. You could see exactly how all of the theater "magic" was done -- no hidden wires, few off-stage costume changes, no special effects aside from lighting -- even the Foley artists making the sound effects and playing the music were onstage, seated comfortably in two ships positioned above the actors. Each of the actors had a primary role, such as the boy (who eventually becomes Peter), Black Stache (Captain Hook), and so forth, but they also played all of the ensemble roles like the pirates or Indian tribe. The script itself is SILLY! The closest play I can think to compare it to is The 39 Steps, but Peter manages to fit in serious moments and a surprisingly emotional story. They made a lot of pop-culture references, and suddenly, out-of-nowhere, they broke into song. Yet, it worked so well with the rest of the storytelling that even though I wouldn't categorize the play as a "musical", it wasn't weird... except perhaps for a musical number that began the second act that has to be seen to be believed. I really thought the guy sitting next to me was going to walk out. I about passed out because I was laughing so hard.
I think the reason why the play worked so well for me was that it reminded me often that live theater really is a unique experience. Since they weren't going for realism, I got to enjoy the process with them. We weren't asked to get up on stage or respond in any specific way, but we were still a part of it. The actors pantomimed going up and down stairs, they interacted with the audience just a smidgen, and it was very obvious they were having a great time. One of my very favorite moments was when the Black Stache lost his hand, and everyone onstage was completely silent and in shock, and the Black Stache was whimpering in pain, and most of the audience laughed because of his reaction and the way it happened... and a little girl in the orchestra (I could hear her from the balcony even though she wasn't yelling) asked very clearly: "Are you okay?" and the Black Stache looked at her, nodded, and said -- still in pain -- "Uh-huh" as if to reassure her. I can't describe it in a way to give it justice, but the audience DIED. Since it was such a silly play and we were all in it together, it wasn't out of place that she yelled out, that he responded, or that we all laughed. I want to see it again just so I can watch the Black Stache up close; his performance was genius. There are times as an actor that you really feel like you connect with an audience and that the audience realizes that the performance is directly affected by their support, be it applause or laughter or energy. I get the feeling that the cast of Peter and the Starcatcher feels that every day. Lucky!
After the play ended, the gentleman next to me made sure to tell me how much he enjoyed the second act. He could not stop smiling! He loved getting to the island and discovering how the Peter Pan we knew came about. I think that's the highest praise I can give the show: an opinionated old man who went in expecting one thing completely changed his tune by the end. Guess you're never too old to love a well-told story, no matter how unfamiliar and unconventional the storytelling may be.
Turns out, a friend from high school saw the same performance. We met up during intermission to chat and take a photo. I had forgotten how much Lauren looks like Gwyneth Paltrow. Also how nice and cool she is (Lauren, not Gwyneth, though I'm sure G is lovely in person).
After the play, I poked around the gift shops and ended up buying a really inexpensive copy of William Shakespeare's As You Like It. I wish there had been a Dover Thrift edition of Much Ado About Nothing, too, since I'm partial to that publisher and have seen several productions of that script lately. However, I was satisfied to have at least one thing -- besides memories, of course -- to commemorate the trip! I ate a leisurely -- and gigantic -- bagel sandwich from The Pastry Pub for dinner. I'd only recently heard about the place, but my SUU friends assured me it was a must-eat. I didn't love it, and was surprised by the dearth of pastry selection considering the name, but now I can say I've been.
I had about an hour before my evening play, so I went back to the campus and strolled around a bit. I even went to the orientation for King John and Anything Goes -- the two plays running that night -- so I could get a better feel for what to expect. Then I watched The Greenshow... I think it's okay if I skip it the next time. It didn't hold my attention. But I very much enjoyed the cherry tart I ate while I browsed on my phone!
King John
The Utah Shakespeare Festival has a goal to complete "The History Cycle" of Shakespeare plays in chronological order (and produce all of Shakespeare's plays in the next 13 years). These are the plays written about the actual kings of England. Shakespeare took liberties with the characters and embellished (and probably made up a lot of) the stories, but they give you an idea of what went on back in the day. I admit that I have never seen any of the History plays. It's a second goal of mine to see them all, in order, as they are produced (the next is this Fall).
The first play in The History Cycle is King John. The title character is Richard the Lionheart's little brother (you know, Prince John of Robin Hood fame) and the play deals with the question of who was supposed to rule after Richard died. I liked that it was fairly straightforward. Few of the actors played more than one role, the story was simple, there were almost no props or set changes beyond a throne and some banners to indicate whether they were in England or France's domain. It sounds like a similar set-up to Peter, but the results were very different. It was a traditional play in every sense. If you don't like Shakespeare, you would HATE this play. This was all about the dialogue and the conflict. If I was exhausted at the end it was because no one onstage was left unscathed -- there was a lot of action, a lot of angst, even a few sword fights. I liked that it was plain and simple. A great story that was well-acted and didn't need any flash. I sat with a middle-aged gentleman who sees a TON of plays in SLC and southern Utah and NYC and Vegas (I wish there were more like him), and he and I both liked King John. I kind of wish it were done more often. Someone needs to do a double-feature of The Lion in Winter and then this one (you'll leave feeling very grateful that your family isn't royalty)!
I finally checked into my hotel room after 11pm and was sooo excited to crawl into the king-sized bed and burrow into the five pillows! One of the perks of having your own room! I slept like a log, and morning came far too soon. Fortunately, breakfast was included with the room, so I got to eat a perfect, slightly crispy waffle before facing the fact I had to go home.
When the elderly couple with the seats next to mine sat down before the show, the woman said, "I love Peter Pan," and the husband said, "I hate Peter Pan." He clarified for me during intermission (because he could tell I was loving it) "I like Peter Pan who flies and lives in Neverland." So, I could understand why he wasn't a fan, especially during the first act.
Peter and the Starcatchers is NOT your grandmother's Peter Pan. If you were looking forward to a "classic" play with huge sets and complicated scene changes and flying children, you were disappointed. You could see exactly how all of the theater "magic" was done -- no hidden wires, few off-stage costume changes, no special effects aside from lighting -- even the Foley artists making the sound effects and playing the music were onstage, seated comfortably in two ships positioned above the actors. Each of the actors had a primary role, such as the boy (who eventually becomes Peter), Black Stache (Captain Hook), and so forth, but they also played all of the ensemble roles like the pirates or Indian tribe. The script itself is SILLY! The closest play I can think to compare it to is The 39 Steps, but Peter manages to fit in serious moments and a surprisingly emotional story. They made a lot of pop-culture references, and suddenly, out-of-nowhere, they broke into song. Yet, it worked so well with the rest of the storytelling that even though I wouldn't categorize the play as a "musical", it wasn't weird... except perhaps for a musical number that began the second act that has to be seen to be believed. I really thought the guy sitting next to me was going to walk out. I about passed out because I was laughing so hard.
![]() |
| View from the balcony |
After the play ended, the gentleman next to me made sure to tell me how much he enjoyed the second act. He could not stop smiling! He loved getting to the island and discovering how the Peter Pan we knew came about. I think that's the highest praise I can give the show: an opinionated old man who went in expecting one thing completely changed his tune by the end. Guess you're never too old to love a well-told story, no matter how unfamiliar and unconventional the storytelling may be.
Turns out, a friend from high school saw the same performance. We met up during intermission to chat and take a photo. I had forgotten how much Lauren looks like Gwyneth Paltrow. Also how nice and cool she is (Lauren, not Gwyneth, though I'm sure G is lovely in person).
![]() |
| Neither of us has aged since high school. |
![]() |
| I quite like this selfie in front of the Adams Shakespearean Theater |
I had about an hour before my evening play, so I went back to the campus and strolled around a bit. I even went to the orientation for King John and Anything Goes -- the two plays running that night -- so I could get a better feel for what to expect. Then I watched The Greenshow... I think it's okay if I skip it the next time. It didn't hold my attention. But I very much enjoyed the cherry tart I ate while I browsed on my phone!
King John
The first play in The History Cycle is King John. The title character is Richard the Lionheart's little brother (you know, Prince John of Robin Hood fame) and the play deals with the question of who was supposed to rule after Richard died. I liked that it was fairly straightforward. Few of the actors played more than one role, the story was simple, there were almost no props or set changes beyond a throne and some banners to indicate whether they were in England or France's domain. It sounds like a similar set-up to Peter, but the results were very different. It was a traditional play in every sense. If you don't like Shakespeare, you would HATE this play. This was all about the dialogue and the conflict. If I was exhausted at the end it was because no one onstage was left unscathed -- there was a lot of action, a lot of angst, even a few sword fights. I liked that it was plain and simple. A great story that was well-acted and didn't need any flash. I sat with a middle-aged gentleman who sees a TON of plays in SLC and southern Utah and NYC and Vegas (I wish there were more like him), and he and I both liked King John. I kind of wish it were done more often. Someone needs to do a double-feature of The Lion in Winter and then this one (you'll leave feeling very grateful that your family isn't royalty)!
I finally checked into my hotel room after 11pm and was sooo excited to crawl into the king-sized bed and burrow into the five pillows! One of the perks of having your own room! I slept like a log, and morning came far too soon. Fortunately, breakfast was included with the room, so I got to eat a perfect, slightly crispy waffle before facing the fact I had to go home. There you have it. One short day, and it was all over. It was everything I hoped, and just a little more than I expected. I wasn't quite ready to come home, of course. I could have used just one more day of vacation...two would have been just right ;-)
There's always next year, except next year I really do want to see ALL of the shows! 2014 is going to be the year I fulfill that dream, I just know it! I don't want to miss any of the plays they have lined up:
Put it on your calendars now!
Are you at all interested in seeing any of these? Does Peter and the Starcatcher sound intriguing to you, or are you more of a traditionalist?
Put it on your calendars now!
Are you at all interested in seeing any of these? Does Peter and the Starcatcher sound intriguing to you, or are you more of a traditionalist?




















